ROSÆ‘s Origins in Physical Constants and Environmental Conditions

 

  1. The size of the planet earth, its gravity field, and its atmospheric extent.
    1. Defines practical orbit altitudes for satellites vs. their angular velocity.

                                                              i.      Defines the optimum resonant orbit angular velocity for ROSÆ of 5 : 1 (an orbit-to-earth angular velocity ratio of 5-to-1), which is lowest resonant orbit, which avoids atmospheric interference, and:

                                                            ii.      The 5:1 orbit has the most stable tri-axial Potential Energy "Well", for the most stable “Natural Station Keeping”, for all of ROSÆ‘s satellites (per NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center “Resonant Orbit Study” circa 1967 - 68), and:

                                                          iii.      Only the ROSÆ architecture has all of its satellites in stable equilibrium with the earth’s tri-axial gravity field (per Dr. Carl Wagner's evaluation of all useful satellite architectures examined during this NASA sponsored study).

  1. The earth’s molten core and the moon’s size and orbital inclination.
    1. Creates the Earth – Moon Tri-axial gravity field, which in turn creates the Potential Energy "Wells" used by Resonant Orbits.
    2. The Sun’s size and flux density vs. the earth’s magnetic field controls the magnetosphere’s altitude.
    3. This creates the two Van Allen belts, in which ROSÆ in its 5:1 resonant orbit is in the saddle between these belts, safe from radiation damage inside a Van Allen Belt.
    4. Also, at the altitude where ROSÆ is at its preferred 5 : 1 resonance, it is under the magnetosphere and so is protected from the sun’s harmful flux.
  2. ROSÆ’s distribution of equilateral triads are necessary for real time phase closure of MIRIAH’s Interferometers.
    1. This geometry fits the major existing East - West 900 longitude distribution (prime meridians at 00, 900 East, 1800, 900 West), as well as the major Latitude North and South 900 distribution, which adds up to eight of these spherical equilateral triangles. But the disc is at the leading edge of the multi-access data storage technology (to be Internet compatible). Then to accommodate a disc's flat surface, ROSÆ - MIRIAH uses eight plane geometry triads as its mapping base (rather the eight spherical triangles). This then conforms to an octahedron (like this hyperlinked example) with it's eight plane equilateral triangle surfaces, as the conformal mapping base.
    2. ROSÆ’s tri-axial (900 x 900 x 900 sectored) geometry perfectly fits the earth’s tri-axial gravity field.
    3. Among all solids, the octahedron has the minimum number of equilateral triangle sides (or mapping "plates"), which also have no data discontinuity along either the map edges, or the interior (and so an octahedron is a conformal mapping base with data continuity throughout its entire area).
    4. In this next hyperlinked figure, one can readily see this continuity, visibly showing this octahedron mapping base is conformal, with neither "poles" (causing "white spots"), or "nodes" (causing "black spots"), or mismatches along its edges (disrupting the mapping octahedron's plate-to-plate holographic continuity). Rather this mapped recording shows a smooth transition from spherical to flat surface (thanks to the methods we developed in our SARAH Patent).
    5. Further, it is entirely comprised of equilateral triangles, as necessary for minimum phase lock acquisition time for MIRIAH's triads of Interferometers (in the methods of MIRIAH, our newest Patent), i.e., its huge VLA triads (Very Large Arrays), which incrementally illuminate huge Continent sized FOVs (Fields of View) during an extended Coherence Time.
    6. Since all 8 VLA triads are perpendicular to 8 different isometric axes, then every VLA's 3-D Interferometer signal envelope deposits 2-D imagery data which is perfectly linear, and orthogonal, thereby assuring maximum accuracy for the data, as it is scaled from FOV to disc.
  3. At ROSÆ’s optimum resonance altitude, MIRIAH’s VLA size is consistent with a positive coherent Gain, which is why only ROSÆ - MIRIAH's architecture is capable of a 2nd Power-Aperture (2nd PA), which is the key to its extraordinarly huge coherent Gain (~ 1016).
  4. The VLA:FOV ratio varies ~ 4:1 to 5:1, which enables practical optical focal lengths within the satellite's MF (Matched Filter) illumination system. These focal lengths are necessary for a positive coherent Gain as shown in Figure 6, which enables a 2nd PA.
  5. This is totally unique for ROSÆ - MIRIAH, since ROSÆ lends the stability MIRIAH needs to slowly aggregated the MF, as it generates holograms of all pixels moving across the entire FOV, thereby enabling its breakthough in coherent Gain (the secret to its amazing performance and cost effectiveness).
  6. All Interferometers are Self Registering, and MIRIAH has such a huge Gain (see 4. above), that the SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) at the input of the 2nd PA can be very negative. Yet, the final output SNR will be extremely high (and so penetrate soil, buildings, etc,). These capabilities (Items 4,5 & 6) will hugely lower the cost of MIRIAH while hugely increasing its Benefits (Profits, Demand, Supply, etc.). This technology's 1016 Gain improvement is so gigantic, that it moves EM imaging technology a Billion times closer to the ultimate boundary of Physics than otherwise possible.

(For those readers who want a deeper technical approach, please go to the MIRIAH Introduction).

 

Inventions and Interventions

 

These amazingly fortuitous set of circumstances are the key to ROSÆ - MIRIAH's breakthrough performance in practice. In theory, ROSÆ - MIRIAH moves technology a Billion times closer to the boundary of Physics than we could achieve before with the "best" existing Satellite EM architecture. Yet, if each of these specifications were to be considered as a statistical probability, and we used a conservative 10% probability per spec, then the probability for these specs to occur as a conjoined set, is about: 0.0000000000000001. Then the probability this was not “happenstance” but rather an “intelligent design” is: 99.99999999999999%. (Note that while this evidence clearly implies a Devine Being (God), nevertheless, this evidence is entirely the finding of Physics and Mathematics).

 

With such an overpowering statistic, then only God could have been present when this “intelligent design” was planned (the cosmos is 14 Billion Years old), so how can we say a man “invented” ROSÆ (rather than “discovered it”?)

 

Now in all honesty ask yourself - is ROSÆ a man's Invention, or is ROSÆ God’s Intervention?

 

Is ROSÆ a “sign” for our “Doubting Thomas” world, disclosed now at this critical time, by a merciful, provident, and fatherly God, to bring His children home in Faith, by helping them with this “sign”, as He did 2,000 years ago, when Jesus provided a “sign” for the Apostle Thomas (John 20:24-29) to help his lagging Faith?

 

Link next to the evidence which compels us to believe that not only is ROSÆ a "sign" from God for a world in great spiritual danger, but was "seen" by the Apostle John 2000 years ago!